Skip to content

Your Favorite Gene and NextBio

2009 April 3
by abhishektiwari

Your Favorite Gene search

In last few months I have tried several customized and/or vertical search engines for life sciences domain. These life science vertical search engines report focused results with further categorization of the search results based on context as well as content. Although all of them are far from my requirements but they are still better than Google and Entrez cross-database search. Entrez has its limitations, it is unable to support the search workflow related to experimental design aside from poor reporting. Currently for my everyday research I prefer Your Favorite Gene a.k.a YFG (Sigma Aldrich) and NextBio, and to me they appear complementary technologies and in future I am looking towards a single tool with characteristic of these two search engines. I would also like to bring your attention towards a relatively new biomedical search engine novo|seek, although novo|seek is still evolving but it equipped with a powerful text mining technology along with a elegant reporting interface with effective filter mechanism. Currently novo|seek can search for biomedical literature in Medline and US Grants.
novo|seek filter
Your Favorite Gene(YFG)
Sigma-Aldrich’s Your Favorite Gene search engine is powered by Ingenuity’s Knowledge Base, one of the largest repository of biological and chemical networks which makes it an excellent exploratory tool. Initial search results can be further explored through dynamic networks rendered using Ingenuity’s Knowledge Base, offering deep insight into different types of interactions. In order to model and evaluate prospective experiments, user can search by gene, protein, function, disease, species, tissue or pathway to access a range of previous research findings and biological information. YFG not only helps to design effective experiment but it is also instrumental for a better selection of experimental products such as antibodies, bio-active molecules, bio-assays mostly offered by Sigma-Aldrich. YFG reporting interface is well structured and highly interactive. For example Interaction network and Canonical Pathway provides flash based network explorers
CD36 Pathway in YFACons: At first place you can not do anything else other than printing and exploring the results, for example YFG does not provide any options to save your analysis. Unless you have access to Ingenuity Pathways Analysis tool you can not export/import the analysis/experimental data. There is no API support for YFG which is very critical feature for process automation (LIMS perspective). Last but not least, experimental product offerings are totally restricted to Sigma-Aldrich’s portfolio.

NextBio

Take all cons of YFG as pros of NextBio, for example NextBio has (I assumed API features are free to registered users)
  • A REST-based search API to retrieve data out of NextBio
  • An API for secure bulk import of data
  • An auto-complete widget for search and tagging using our ontology

LDL Receptor at NextBioNow on search area, apart from searching for gene, protein, function, disease, species, tissue or pathway NextBio interface also provide information about clinical trials , public domain microarrays data, mutation and phenotypic studies. For example it helped me to locate the ongoing clinical trail studies associate with LDL receptor pathway. Further NextBio can be used as collaborative web 2.0 interface, which enables to connect with people working in your area of research. Another major feature is data and project sharing between users within the NextBio community.
Cons: Reporting interface is tabbed one, mostly text oriented. NextBio interface does not provide any visual exploration for the search results like YFG network explorer, but I guess that drawback can be compensated at user end using APIs with freely available tolls such as Graphviz, aiSee, Gaggle etc. As I mentioned YFG mostly feature experimental products from Sigma-Aldrich, but as of now there is no such utility with NextBio, which can be major improvement area in the future. For example NextBio can utilize/monetize its search interface to populate the related products from different vendors, it will allow users to design their experimental studies around available product options, very much like eMolecules.com which initially started as chemical molecule search engine and later transformed into e-commerce solution for chemical molecules. Both YFG and NextBio do not provide chemical structure search, they typically rely on the text based search.

Overall these tools make it easier to locate life sciences related research information on the web, they are just taking off and in coming days they are going to be more specialized, effective and featured.

Other latest releases:

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Slashdot
  • HackerNews
  • Reddit
  • del.icio.us
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Posterous
  • Tumblr

Related posts:

  1. Chem4Word Project
5 Responses leave one →
  1. April 3, 2009

    Guess what I need both for my curation setup

  2. April 3, 2009

    Your Favorite Gene and NextBio: In last few months I have tried several customized and/or vertical search engine.. http://tinyurl.com/coesx3

  3. April 3, 2009

    Thank you very much for the post!!
    I also like the search-engine topic, but I didn’t know too much about science-related ones.

    It is not very much related to science, but if you want to know more on search engines in general I recommend you this old good web site:
    - http://www.searchlores.org/main.htm

  4. April 4, 2009

    Your Favorite Gene and NextBio- by Fisheye Perspective http://tinyurl.com/coesx3

  5. April 6, 2009

    reading “your favorite gene and nextbio” http://is.gd/r0IX from @abhishektiwari

Leave a Reply

Note:You can use basic XHTML in your comments. Your email address will never be published.

Subscribe to this comment feed via RSS