Skip to content

BioPAX or SBML?

2009 July 1
by abhishektiwari

Katherine Mejia asked this question on twitter, well just now I want to keep it short,

  • Both BioPAX (Level 3) and SBML (Level 2) can encode signaling pathways, metabolic pathways and regulatory pathways, although SBML can represent finer details.
  • If your aim is simulation and prediction then SBML seems to be reasonable choice.
  • SBML has better software and API support than BioPAX, no doubt this one is major advantage with SBML.
  • Similarly BioPAX is rich standard when it comes to encode the interactions such as genetics, molecular or non-molecular.
BioPAX or SBML or CellMLVisual comparison of SBML, BioPAX, CellML and PSI
Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Slashdot
  • HackerNews
  • Reddit
  • del.icio.us
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Posterous
  • Tumblr

Related posts:

  1. Mosaic of biological standards and domain-specific languages
  2. Comparison of CellML and SBML
  3. Welcome and Introduction to CellML
  4. A Blogger's Guide to Systems Biology-1
  5. Open Flow Biological Network Initiative

from → Systems Biology

3 Responses leave one →
  1. Abhishek Tiwari permalink
    July 1, 2009

    @KatherineMejia may be this can help BioPAX or SBML? http://tinyurl.com/nfz2jy

    Reply
  2. abhishektiwari permalink
    July 1, 2009

    @KatherineMejia may be this can help BioPAX or SBML? http://tinyurl.com/nfz2jy

    Reply
  3. Justin H. Johnson permalink
    July 1, 2009

    Liked: BioPAX or SBML?- by Fisheye Perspective http://ow.ly/giZE

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Note:You can use basic XHTML in your comments. Your email address will never be published.

Subscribe to this comment feed via RSS